Abstract

Eye pain, or ocular pain, is pain felt in or around the eye. The Medical Subject Headings classification files it under pain as a symptom, not a disease, and it is a revealing case in pain perception because the surface of the eye is the most densely innervated tissue in the body, yet the pain it reports is a poor guide to the state of that tissue. Much ocular pain is nociceptive, arising from a scratched or inflamed cornea, but a large and underrecognized share is neuropathic, persisting in an eye that looks entirely normal, the phenomenon clinicians call pain without stain. This article treats eye pain as a worked case in corneal nociception, the ocular surface pain system, photophobia, central sensitization, and the psychophysics of measuring a private experience that no instrument can read.

Keywords: ocular pain, corneal nociception, neuropathic ocular pain, photophobia, central sensitization

Eye pain names a place the sufferer is sure of and a cause they are often wrong about. In the Medical Subject Headings classification it is defined as pain in or around the eye and is filed as a form of pain rather than as a disease, a placement that matters because ocular pain, like all pain, is not a simple readout of local tissue damage (Raja et al., 2020). The paradox is sharp here because the cornea is the most richly innervated surface in the human body, so a trivial scratch can be agonizing while, at the other extreme, an eye with no visible injury at all can burn and ache for years (Marfurt et al., 2010). Eye pain is therefore a concrete entry point into two of the deepest problems in the science of pain: how a nociceptive signal is generated and amplified, and how a private experience can be measured when it has come loose from any injury an instrument can see (Rosenthal & Borsook, 2012).

Key Takeaways
  • Eye pain (ocular pain) is pain in or around the eye, classified by MeSH under pain as a symptom rather than a disease.
  • The cornea is the most densely innervated tissue in the body, so its nociceptors make the ocular surface exquisitely sensitive to touch, chemicals, cold, and drying.
  • Ocular pain divides into nociceptive pain, which tracks surface damage, and neuropathic ocular pain, which persists in a normal-looking eye, the dissociation clinicians call pain without stain.
  • When corneal nerves are damaged or their central targets sensitized, pain is amplified and decoupled from the ocular surface, so symptoms and signs no longer agree.
  • Because ocular pain is private, it is measured through report and behavior, and photophobia, the aversive amplification of pain by light, is one of its most disabling forms.

What Eye Pain Is

Eye pain is a symptom, pain localized to or around the eye, rather than a diagnosis in itself. It ranges from the sharp, foreign-body sensation of a scratched cornea to a deep, boring ache behind the globe, and its qualities matter because they point to different origins. Surface pain, felt as burning, grittiness, or a foreign body, arises from the ocular surface itself, the cornea and conjunctiva; deep orbital pain, felt as a dull ache, arises from the structures behind and around the eye and from the trigeminal supply they share. The distinction is more than descriptive, because the two are served by different fibers and disturbed by different diseases, and because a patient's own words about the quality of the pain are often the first clue to its source (Mehra et al., 2020).

The striking fact about eye pain is how weakly it tracks visible damage. The International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage, a definition written precisely to sever the assumption that pain is a direct measure of injury at the place it is felt (Raja et al., 2020). Nowhere is that severance more visible than at the ocular surface, where clinicians routinely meet patients whose corneas are agonizing but stain-free under the slit lamp, and, conversely, patients with obvious surface damage who feel little. Ocular pain, in short, is constructed by the nervous system from a corneal signal, not transmitted intact from the cornea, and the whole apparatus of pain science is needed to explain when the two come apart (Belmonte et al., 2004).

Figure 1

The Corneal Nociceptors: Three Sensor Classes on One Surface

The three functional classes of corneal sensory receptor and the stimuli they encode A central cornea sends signals along the trigeminal nerve to the brain. Three classes of receptor are shown: mechano-nociceptors responding to touch and foreign bodies, polymodal nociceptors responding to chemicals, heat, and inflammation, and cold thermoreceptors responding to cooling and drying of the tear film. All three converge on the trigeminal pathway. One corneal surface, three sensor classes, one nerve Cornea most innervated tissue Mechano-nociceptor touch, foreign body → sharp pain Polymodal nociceptor chemicals, heat, acid → burning Cold thermoreceptor cooling, tear drying → dryness Trigeminal to brain (V1)
Note. The cornea carries three functional classes of sensory ending: mechano-nociceptors that fire to touch and foreign bodies, polymodal nociceptors that fire to chemicals, heat, and inflammatory mediators, and cold thermoreceptors that track cooling and the drying of the tear film. All three project through the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve. Original schematic after the corneal receptor physiology of Belmonte et al. (2004).

Corneal nociceptors: one surface, three sensor classes

Apply a stimulus to the cornea and see which receptor classes fire and what the eye feels.

Corneastimulus appliedMechano-nociceptortouch, foreign bodiesPolymodal nociceptorchemicals, heat, inflammationCold thermoreceptorcooling, tear-film drying

Felt as: sharp, well-localized pain

The same corneal surface carries three functional receptor classes. Most stimuli engage one class; drying of the tear film engages both the cold thermoreceptors that sense evaporation and the polymodal nociceptors that signal irritation, which is why dry eye feels both gritty and burning.

Common Forms of Eye Pain

Because MeSH files eye pain as a single symptom rather than a family of narrower descriptors, its varieties are distinguished clinically, by source and mechanism, rather than by a formal subtree. The forms below are not mutually exclusive, and the first division, between pain that tracks surface damage and pain that does not, is the one that matters most at the slit lamp.

FormIn brief
Nociceptive ocular surface painPain from active damage or inflammation of the cornea or conjunctiva, such as an abrasion, a foreign body, or keratitis. It tracks the injury, is felt as sharp or gritty, and eases as the surface heals (Mehra et al., 2020).
Neuropathic ocular painPain from damage or dysfunction of the corneal nerves themselves, felt in an eye that looks normal and stains little; the mismatch of symptoms and signs that gives rise to the phrase pain without stain (Galor et al., 2018).
Dry eye disease painBurning, grittiness, and light sensitivity from a compromised tear film and an inflamed surface. In its chronic form it can shift from a nociceptive to a neuropathic character as corneal nerves are altered (Rosenthal & Borsook, 2012).
PhotophobiaPain or aversive discomfort provoked or intensified by light, mediated by trigeminal and retinal pathways and common in migraine, dry eye, and ocular inflammation (Digre & Brennan, 2012).
Deep orbital and referred eye painA dull ache behind the eye from the orbit, sinuses, or intracranial structures sharing the ophthalmic trigeminal supply, felt in the eye though its source lies elsewhere.
Nociplastic ocular painPersistent eye pain arising from altered central processing rather than ongoing surface damage or a discrete nerve lesion, paralleling nociplastic pain elsewhere in the body (Woolf, 2011).

Table 1. Common clinical forms of eye pain, distinguished by source and mechanism rather than by a MeSH subtree, since MeSH classifies eye pain as a single symptom with no narrower descriptors.

Corneal Nociception and the Ocular Surface Pain System

The physiology behind ocular pain begins with an anatomical extreme. The cornea is innervated some three to six hundred times more densely than skin, its free nerve endings derived from the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and packed into a transparent, blood-free tissue whose only defense against injury is exquisite sensitivity (Marfurt et al., 2010). Those endings fall into three functional classes: mechano-nociceptors that respond to touch and foreign bodies with sharp pain, polymodal nociceptors that respond to chemicals, heat, acidity, and inflammatory mediators with burning, and cold thermoreceptors that track the temperature of the surface and, through it, the drying of the tear film (Belmonte et al., 2004). This is why a scratch that would be trivial on the skin is intensely painful on the cornea, and why dryness, evaporation, and chemical irritants each produce their own characteristic quality of ocular pain.

The decisive insight of the last two decades is that the cornea is not merely a sensitive surface but a distinct pain system that can malfunction in its own right. When corneal nerves are injured, by surgery, by chronic dry eye, or by inflammation, they can become abnormally excitable and generate pain signals in the absence of any ongoing surface threat, so that the eye hurts although nothing is visibly wrong with it (Rosenthal & Borsook, 2012). This neuropathic ocular pain is the ophthalmic instance of a general principle: peripheral nerve damage plus central amplification can decouple pain from tissue state entirely (Galor et al., 2018).

That amplification is the substrate of the single most influential idea in pain science. Gate control theory proposed that the transmission of nociceptive signals is regulated by a gate, opened by small nociceptive fibers, tended toward closure by large touch fibers, and biased in either direction by descending signals from the brain (Melzack & Wall, 1965). The same architecture that gates ocular pain also lets sustained input sensitize it: when nociceptive drive persists, second-order neurons grow more responsive, a process of central sensitization that amplifies subsequent signals and can keep pain going long after any surface injury has healed (Woolf, 2011). An eye that has hurt for a long time can thus become a poor guide to whether anything is still wrong with it at all.

Pain without stain: felt pain = surface signal x central gain

Set a small nociceptive input from a near-normal surface, then turn up the central gain to see symptoms diverge from signs.

Signs (surface)2.0 / 10 (minimal)Symptoms (felt)7.0 / 10 (severe)2.0 x 3.5 = 7.0pain without stain

At gain near 1x, felt pain tracks the surface. Raising the gain models sensitized corneal nerves: a small, near-normal input of 2 felt through a gain of 3.5 becomes a 7 out of 10, the worked example in the text, so severe symptoms coexist with a quiet exam. The gain, not the patient, has changed.

Photophobia and Light-Evoked Pain

Among the forms of ocular pain, photophobia has a special place, because in it an ordinary, non-damaging stimulus, light, becomes a source of genuine pain. Photophobia is not a fear of light but an abnormal sensitivity in which light provokes or intensifies eye and head pain, and it is one of the most disabling features of migraine, dry eye, and ocular inflammation. Its mechanism illuminates how pain systems can be cross-wired: light striking the retina, including the melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells that also drive the pupil and the body clock, can activate trigeminal pain pathways, so that a visual signal is read, in part, as a painful one (Digre & Brennan, 2012). The result is that turning up the lights turns up the pain, an escalation that has no counterpart in a healthy eye.

Photophobia also shows sensitization in action. In a sensitized system, whether from migraine, corneal nerve damage, or chronic inflammation, the light intensity at which discomfort begins falls, so that levels of illumination a healthy person would not notice become painful. The same light, the same retina, and yet a very different experience, because the gain of the pathway that turns light into pain has been turned up (Woolf, 2011). Photophobia is therefore a clean demonstration of the article's central theme: the pain a person feels is set as much by the state of their nervous system as by the stimulus reaching it.

Photophobia: the light level at which light becomes pain

Raise the ambient light, then sensitize the pathway to watch the pain threshold fall so ordinary light starts to hurt.

at easethreshold 70%Evoked pain: 0.0 / 10

In a normal eye discomfort begins only at high illumination. Sensitization, from migraine, corneal nerve damage, or inflammation, lowers the threshold so that light a healthy person would not notice becomes painful. The same light and the same retina yield a very different experience because the gain of the light-to-pain pathway has been turned up.

Measuring Eye Pain

Because pain is private, it cannot be read off an instrument the way a corneal abrasion can be seen under fluorescein; it must be measured through report. The gap between what the slit lamp shows and what the patient feels is precisely what makes ocular pain hard to measure and easy to dismiss, and it is why the assessment of eye pain increasingly separates two things a single glance conflates: the signs on the surface and the symptoms the person reports (Galor et al., 2018). A patient with severe symptoms and minimal signs is not exaggerating; they are exhibiting the dissociation that neuropathic ocular pain predicts.

The tools of measurement are the tools of pain psychophysics generally, adapted to the eye. Intensity is captured with numerical or visual analog scales, and dedicated ocular symptom questionnaires ask separately about burning, grittiness, and light sensitivity so that quality, not just amount, is recorded. The multidimensional structure of pain can be recovered with instruments such as the McGill Pain Questionnaire, which scores sensory, affective, and evaluative descriptors rather than a single number, distinguishing the sharp, foreign-body quality of a corneal abrasion from the deep ache of orbital pain (Melzack, 1975). Across all of these tools runs one theme: measuring eye pain is a psychophysical act of scaling a private experience, not a physical reading of the eye, and its accuracy turns on asking about the experience rather than inferring it from the surface (Treede et al., 2019).

Attention, Meaning, and the Experience of Eye Pain

The intensity of eye pain is set not only by the corneal signal but by what the brain does with it, and the first modulator is attention. Pain is built to interrupt: it captures attention, disrupts whatever a person was doing, and demands a response, an interruptive function that is itself a cognitive-affective mechanism (Eccleston & Crombez, 1999). Ocular pain is unusually good at this because vision is the sense people rely on most, so a burning eye both hurts and threatens the very channel used to escape it, and the anxious over-monitoring that follows genuinely worsens the pain through the descending control that gate control theory anticipated and that is now mapped to specific cognitive and emotional brain systems (Bushnell et al., 2013).

The second modulator is meaning. The same corneal signal is a minor nuisance when it is read as a passing bout of dryness and a source of dread when it is read as a threat to sight, and this is not merely a matter of mood: the interpretation feeds back through descending pathways onto the transmission of the signal itself (Melzack & Wall, 1965). Chronic ocular pain is often accompanied by the anxiety and low mood that both follow from unrelenting pain and, in turn, amplify it, so that managing eye pain well means managing more than the ocular surface; it means addressing attention, interpretation, and, where pain has become chronic and amplified, the central mechanisms that keep it going (Cohen et al., 2021).

Worked Example

Suppose a patient reports severe, constant burning in both eyes, rating it 7 out of 10, yet the examining ophthalmologist finds the corneas almost clear: a trace of dryness, no abrasion, no infection, essentially a normal-looking ocular surface. The task is to reconcile a loud symptom with a quiet sign, and the mechanism of central amplification makes the reasoning concrete. Model the perceived pain as the nociceptive input from the surface multiplied by the central gain of the pain pathway. In a healthy eye the gain is near one, so a near-normal surface producing an input of about 2 on a 10-point scale would be felt as roughly a 2: mild, matching the exam. In this patient the corneal nerves have been sensitized by chronic dry eye, and the gain has risen to about 3.5. The same small input of 2 is therefore felt as 2 x 3.5 = 7, capped at the scale maximum of 10, which is exactly the severe pain the patient reports. The point of the exercise is what the arithmetic explains: not that the patient is exaggerating a mild problem, but that a real, small peripheral signal is being multiplied by a nervous system whose gain has been turned up. The felt intensity is the product of input and gain, and when signs and symptoms diverge it is usually the gain, not the patient, that has changed.

Discussion

Eye pain is one of the commonest complaints in ophthalmology, and it turns out to require the whole apparatus of pain science to explain. Its simplest form, the sharp pain of a corneal abrasion, is a genuine nociceptive readout of surface damage, and it is tempting to generalize from that case and treat all eye pain as a sign of a problem on the surface. But the sheer sensitivity of the cornea, the existence of a dedicated ocular surface pain system that can malfunction on its own, the power of central sensitization to amplify and sustain pain after healing, and the way light itself can become painful in a sensitized eye all show that felt ocular pain is constructed by the nervous system rather than transmitted intact from the eye. This is the general lesson of pain research made unusually concrete by anatomy: the experience of pain is the joint product of nociception, gating and sensitization in the central nervous system, and cognitive interpretation, and the felt intensity can diverge sharply from anything an instrument can see.

The practical corollary is that eye pain is managed badly when the surface is treated in isolation. Repeatedly treating a normal-looking eye with lubricants leaves a neuropathic or central mechanism untouched, and dismissing severe pain in a stain-free eye as exaggeration abandons a patient whose suffering is real. Eye pain is also a clear demonstration of why the measurement of pain is a psychophysical rather than a physical act, and why asking a patient what they feel, and how, is not a courtesy but the only access anyone has to the experience being treated.

Current Directions

Two lines of current work bear directly on eye pain. The first is the consolidation of neuropathic ocular pain as a recognized entity with its own diagnostic approach and mechanisms, moving it from a puzzling exception to a category clinicians actively test for. Contemporary work distinguishes peripheral from central ocular pain at the bedside, using tools such as the response to topical anesthetic to localize where along the pathway the pain is generated, and asks how chronic dry eye converts a nociceptive problem into a neuropathic one (Galor et al., 2018; Mehra et al., 2020). The second is the broader reframing of chronic pain that has reshaped how persistent ocular pain is understood. The recognition of a third mechanistic category, nociplastic pain, arising from altered central processing rather than ongoing tissue damage or a nerve lesion, gives a name to the eye pain that outlasts its cause and responds poorly to treatments aimed at the surface (Woolf, 2011). Alongside it, the formal separation of acute pain as a symptom from chronic pain as a condition in its own right, now embedded in the international disease classification, has changed how long-standing eye pain is coded, studied, and managed (Treede et al., 2019). Together these developments are pushing the care of difficult eye pain away from a narrow focus on the ocular surface and toward the mechanism-based, patient-reported perspective this article describes (Cohen et al., 2021).

Common Misconceptions

If the eye looks normal, the pain is not real.
A large share of chronic eye pain is neuropathic and occurs in an eye that stains little and looks essentially normal. The mismatch of severe symptoms and minimal signs is exactly what damaged or sensitized corneal nerves produce; the pain is as real as any other (Galor et al., 2018; Rosenthal & Borsook, 2012).
Eye pain is always proportional to the damage on the surface.
Perceived pain is the surface signal multiplied by the gain of a nervous system that can be sensitized, so a small input can be felt as severe pain and, conversely, obvious damage can hurt little. Intensity tracks input and central gain together, not damage alone (Woolf, 2011).
Photophobia is a fear of light.
Photophobia is not a phobia but an abnormal sensitivity in which light provokes genuine eye and head pain, through retinal signals that activate trigeminal pain pathways. It is a sensory-pain phenomenon, not an anxiety about light (Digre & Brennan, 2012).

Glossary

Central sensitization.
An increase in the responsiveness of central pain neurons following sustained input, amplifying subsequent pain and able to keep it going after any surface injury has healed.
Ciliary nerves.
The sensory branches of the ophthalmic trigeminal division that carry pain signals from the cornea and interior of the eye to the brain.
Cornea.
The transparent, blood-free front surface of the eye and the most densely innervated tissue in the body, whose sensitivity is its main defense against injury.
Corneal nociceptor.
A free nerve ending in the cornea that encodes threatening stimuli; the peripheral origin of ocular surface pain, in mechano-nociceptor, polymodal, and cold classes.
Dry eye disease.
A common disorder of the tear film and ocular surface producing burning, grittiness, and light sensitivity, and a leading route by which ocular pain becomes chronic and neuropathic.
Gate control theory.
The theory that a gating mechanism in the central nervous system regulates nociceptive transmission, modulated by large-fiber input and by descending control from the brain.
Neuropathic ocular pain.
Eye pain arising from damage or dysfunction of the corneal nerves rather than ongoing surface injury, felt in a normal-looking eye; the basis of pain without stain.
Nociception.
The neural encoding of stimuli that threaten tissue; the peripheral signaling that precedes, but is not identical to, pain.
Nociceptive pain.
Pain that tracks active tissue damage or inflammation, such as the pain of a corneal abrasion; it eases as the injury heals.
Nociplastic pain.
Pain arising from altered nociceptive processing without clear evidence of tissue damage or a nerve lesion; the mechanism behind eye pain that outlasts its cause.
Ocular surface pain system.
The view of the cornea and its nerves as a dedicated pain system that can malfunction in its own right, producing pain without visible surface damage.
Pain without stain.
The clinical dissociation in which a patient reports severe ocular pain while the cornea shows little or no damage on fluorescein staining; the hallmark of neuropathic ocular pain.
Photophobia.
Abnormal sensitivity in which light provokes or intensifies eye and head pain, mediated by retinal signals that activate trigeminal pain pathways; not a fear of light.
Polymodal nociceptor.
A corneal receptor that responds to several kinds of threat at once, including chemicals, heat, and inflammatory mediators, and signals a burning quality of pain.
Trigeminal nerve.
The fifth cranial nerve, whose ophthalmic division (V1) carries all sensation from the cornea and eye and links ocular pain to headache and photophobia.

Key Researchers

Carlos Belmonte (contemporary). Ocular physiologist at the Instituto de Neurociencias (CSIC-UMH) in Alicante who mapped the functional classes of corneal sensory receptor and the neural basis of sensation in intact and injured corneas. Wikidata - Google Scholar - Faculty Page

David Borsook (contemporary). Pain neuroscientist at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital who, with Rosenthal, framed the cornea as a distinct pain system whose dysfunction underlies neuropathic ocular pain. Faculty Page

Kathleen B. Digre (contemporary). Neuro-ophthalmologist at the University of Utah whose review synthesized the mechanisms of photophobia, the aversive amplification of pain by light. Faculty Page

Anat Galor (contemporary). Ophthalmologist and clinician-scientist at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, who established neuropathic ocular pain as a distinct, underevaluated feature of dry eye. Faculty Page - Google Scholar

Ronald Melzack (1929-2019). Psychologist at McGill University who, with Patrick Wall, proposed the gate control theory of pain and developed the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the foundational instrument for the multidimensional measurement of pain. Wikipedia - Wikidata - Google Scholar

Perry Rosenthal (1933-2018). Ophthalmologist and founder of the Boston Foundation for Sight who proposed that the cornea harbors a dedicated pain system whose dysfunction produces pain without visible surface damage. Wikipedia - Wikidata

Clifford J. Woolf (contemporary). Neurobiologist at Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School who described central sensitization and its implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Faculty Page - Wikipedia - Wikidata

Frequently Asked Questions

What is eye pain?
Eye pain, or ocular pain, is pain felt in or around the eye. It is a symptom rather than a single disease, and it may arise from the ocular surface itself or from damaged corneal nerves and central pain pathways (Mehra et al., 2020).

Why is a scratch on the eye so much more painful than a scratch on the skin?
The cornea is the most densely innervated tissue in the body, packed with nociceptors because it is transparent and blood-free and relies on sensitivity for protection, so even a small injury generates an intense pain signal (Marfurt et al., 2010).

My eyes hurt badly but the doctor says they look normal. Is the pain real?
Yes. A large share of chronic eye pain is neuropathic, arising from damaged or sensitized corneal nerves rather than visible surface injury, so the eye can look normal and stain little while genuinely hurting, a mismatch clinicians call pain without stain (Galor et al., 2018; Rosenthal & Borsook, 2012).

What is photophobia?
Photophobia is an abnormal sensitivity in which light provokes or intensifies eye and head pain. It is not a fear of light but a sensory-pain phenomenon, arising when retinal signals activate trigeminal pain pathways, and it is common in migraine and dry eye (Digre & Brennan, 2012).

Why does chronic eye pain sometimes get worse rather than better?
Sustained nociceptive input can sensitize central pain neurons, so pain is amplified and can persist and even intensify after the original surface problem has healed, the mechanism now called nociplastic pain (Woolf, 2011).

How is eye pain measured?
Through report, using intensity scales and ocular symptom questionnaires that ask separately about burning, grittiness, and light sensitivity, and multidimensional tools such as the McGill Pain Questionnaire; measuring eye pain is a psychophysical act, not a physical reading of the eye (Melzack, 1975).

Can dry eye cause real pain?
Yes. Dry eye disease produces burning, grittiness, and light sensitivity from a compromised tear film and an inflamed surface, and in its chronic form it can alter corneal nerves so that the pain becomes neuropathic (Rosenthal & Borsook, 2012).

Why does anxiety about my eyes seem to make the pain worse?
Pain captures attention and its intensity is shaped by interpretation, so anxious over-monitoring of a painful eye genuinely amplifies the pain through descending pathways, while distraction can dampen it (Eccleston & Crombez, 1999; Bushnell et al., 2013).

References

Belmonte, C., Acosta, M. C., & Gallar, J. (2004). Neural basis of sensation in intact and injured corneas. Experimental Eye Research, 78(3), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2003.09.023

Bushnell, M. C., Čeko, M., & Low, L. A. (2013). Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3516

Cohen, S. P., Vase, L., & Hooten, W. M. (2021). Chronic pain: An update on burden, best practices, and new advances. The Lancet, 397(10289), 2082-2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7

Digre, K. B., & Brennan, K. C. (2012). Shedding light on photophobia. Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, 32(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNO.0b013e3182474548

Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999). Pain demands attention: A cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356

Galor, A., Moein, H.-R., Lee, C., Rodriguez, A., Felix, E. R., Sarantopoulos, K. D., & Levitt, R. C. (2018). Neuropathic pain and dry eye. The Ocular Surface, 16(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.10.001

Marfurt, C. F., Cox, J., Deek, S., & Dvorscak, L. (2010). Anatomy of the human corneal innervation. Experimental Eye Research, 90(4), 478-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2009.12.010

Mehra, D., Cohen, N. K., & Galor, A. (2020). Ocular surface pain: A narrative review. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 9(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-020-00263-9

Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science, 150(3699), 971-979. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3699.971

Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1(3), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5

Raja, S. N., Carr, D. B., Cohen, M., Finnerup, N. B., Flor, H., Gibson, S., Keefe, F. J., Mogil, J. S., Ringkamp, M., Sluka, K. A., Song, X.-J., Stevens, B., Sullivan, M. D., Tutelman, P. R., Ushida, T., & Vader, K. (2020). The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: Concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain, 161(9), 1976-1982. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939

Rosenthal, P., & Borsook, D. (2012). The corneal pain system. Part I: The missing piece of the dry eye puzzle. The Ocular Surface, 10(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2012.01.002

Treede, R.-D., Rief, W., Barke, A., Aziz, Q., Bennett, M. I., Benoliel, R., Cohen, M., Evers, S., Finnerup, N. B., First, M. B., Giamberardino, M. A., Kaasa, S., Korwisi, B., Kosek, E., Lavand'homme, P., Nicholas, M., Perrot, S., Scholz, J., Schug, S., … Wang, S.-J. (2019). Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: The IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain, 160(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384

Woolf, C. J. (2011). Central sensitization: Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain, 152(3 Suppl), S2-S15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030