Abstract

Earache, or otalgia, is pain felt in or around the ear. The Medical Subject Headings classification files it under pain as a symptom, not a disease, and it is a textbook case of a general principle in pain perception: felt pain is a poor guide to its own source. A large share of all earache is referred, the pain originating not in the ear but in the teeth, jaw, throat, or neck, and only seeming to come from the ear because those structures share the ear's richly convergent innervation by cranial nerves V, VII, IX, and X and the upper cervical nerves. This article treats earache as a worked case in referred pain, convergence, nociception, and the psychophysics of measuring a private experience that no instrument can read, especially in the young children who suffer most of it.

Keywords: referred pain, otalgia, convergence-projection, nociception, pediatric pain measurement

Earache names a location the sufferer is sure of and a source they are often wrong about. In the Medical Subject Headings classification it is defined as pain in the ear and is filed as a form of pain rather than as a disease, a placement that matters because ear pain, like all pain, is not a simple readout of local tissue damage. The ear can ache when it is perfectly healthy, because it shares its sensory nerves with the teeth, the jaw joint, the throat, and the neck, and the brain cannot always tell which of those structures a nociceptive signal came from (Norris & Koontz, 2020). Earache is therefore a concrete, universally familiar entry point into two of the deepest problems in the science of pain: how the nervous system infers the source of a signal, and how a private experience can be measured at all (Raja et al., 2020).

Key Takeaways
  • Earache (otalgia) is pain in or around the ear, classified by MeSH under pain as a symptom rather than a disease.
  • A large share of earache is referred: the pain is felt in a normal ear but originates in the teeth, jaw, throat, larynx, or neck.
  • Referral happens because the ear shares its innervation with those structures through cranial nerves V, VII, IX, and X and the upper cervical nerves, whose afferents converge on shared second-order neurons.
  • Convergence-projection explains the misattribution: when inputs from the ear and a distant structure meet on one neuron, the brain cannot recover which sent the signal and defaults to the more usual source.
  • Because ear pain is private, it is measured through report, using tools such as the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and observational scales built for the preverbal children in whom earache is commonest.

What Earache Is

Earache is a symptom, pain localized to the ear, rather than a diagnosis in itself. Its causes divide into two broad classes that behave very differently. Primary, or otogenic, otalgia arises from disease of the ear itself: acute otitis media, the middle-ear infection that is nearly universal in early childhood; otitis externa, inflammation of the ear canal; or a problem of the eardrum. Otitis media alone is one of the commonest reasons a young child is brought to a doctor and prescribed antibiotics anywhere in the world, driven by the short, horizontal eustachian tube of the child that clears the middle ear poorly (Schilder et al., 2016). Secondary, or referred, otalgia arises from a source outside the ear entirely; the ear is structurally normal, yet it is where the pain is felt.

The striking fact about earache is how often the ear is the innocent party. In adults especially, a large share of ear pain, by some accounts approaching half, is referred from the teeth, the temporomandibular joint, the throat, the larynx, or the cervical spine, so that an examining clinician who finds a normal ear must go looking elsewhere for the source (Norris & Koontz, 2020). This is not a quirk of the ear; it is the general nature of pain thrown into sharp relief. The International Association for the Study of Pain defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage, a definition written precisely to sever the assumption that pain is a direct measure of injury at the place it is felt (Raja et al., 2020). Earache is that severance made vivid: the felt location and the actual source are routinely different places.

Figure 1

The Ear's Convergent Innervation: Five Nerves, Many Sources

The sensory nerves of the ear and the distant structures they also serve A central ear receives sensory branches from five nerves. The auriculotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve also serves the teeth and jaw joint; the facial nerve serves a small area of the ear; the glossopharyngeal nerve also serves the throat and tonsil; the vagus nerve also serves the larynx; and the upper cervical nerves also serve the neck. Disease in any of those distant structures can be felt as ear pain. One ear, five nerves, many possible sources Ear where pain is felt CN V (auriculotemporal) teeth, jaw joint, mouth CN VII (facial) small area of the ear CN IX (glossopharyngeal) throat, tonsil, tongue base CN X (vagus) larynx, hypopharynx C2-C3 (cervical) neck, upper spine
Note. The ear receives sensory fibers from the trigeminal (V), facial (VII), glossopharyngeal (IX), and vagus (X) cranial nerves and from the upper cervical nerves. Each of those nerves also serves distant structures, so disease in a tooth, the throat, or the larynx can be felt as ear pain. Original schematic after the referred-pain anatomy of secondary otalgia (Norris & Koontz, 2020).
One ear, five nerves: the anatomy of referred otalgia

The ear is sensed by four cranial nerves and the upper cervical nerves, and each of those nerves also serves a distant structure. Select a nerve to see what part of the ear it carries and which faraway organ can send pain the brain reads as an earache.

the earCN VCN VIICN IXCN XC2 to C3
Glossopharyngeal (CN IX)
Via its tympanic branch (Jacobson nerve).
Ear territory: the middle-ear cavity and eardrum.
Refers pain from: throat, tonsil, base of tongue.

Because one nerve serves both the ear and a distant organ, disease in that far organ can be felt in the ear. This shared wiring is the anatomical basis of secondary (referred) otalgia.

Common Forms of Earache

Because MeSH files earache as a single symptom rather than a family of narrower descriptors, its varieties are distinguished clinically, by source and mechanism, rather than by a formal subtree. The forms below are not mutually exclusive, and the first division, between pain that comes from the ear and pain that only seems to, is the one that matters most at the bedside.

FormIn brief
Primary (otogenic) otalgiaPain from disease of the ear itself, chiefly acute otitis media and otitis externa. It is commonest in young children, in whom the immature eustachian tube makes middle-ear infection nearly universal (Schilder et al., 2016).
Referred (secondary) otalgiaPain felt in a structurally normal ear whose source lies elsewhere, reaching awareness over the ear's shared cranial and cervical innervation. It accounts for a large share of adult earache (Norris & Koontz, 2020).
Trigeminal (CN V) referralDental disease, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, and lesions of the mouth refer to the ear through the auriculotemporal nerve, the single commonest source of referred otalgia.
Glossopharyngeal and vagal (CN IX / X) referralDisease of the throat, tonsil, tongue base, and larynx refers through the tympanic (Jacobson) and auricular (Arnold) branches, which is why ear pain can follow a tonsillectomy or, ominously, herald a throat cancer.
Cervical (C2-C3) referralDisorders of the upper cervical spine and neck muscles refer to the ear and the skin around it through the great auricular and lesser occipital nerves.
Neuralgic and nociplastic otalgiaEar pain arising from a neuralgia of one of these nerves, or persisting as a centrally amplified pain with no ongoing peripheral source, paralleling nociplastic pain elsewhere in the body (Woolf, 2011).

Table 1. Common clinical forms of earache, distinguished by source and mechanism rather than by a MeSH subtree, since MeSH classifies earache as a single symptom with no narrower descriptors.

The Ear's Convergent Innervation and Referred Pain

The anatomy behind referred otalgia is unusually rich. The ear draws sensory fibers from four cranial nerves and the upper cervical nerves at once: the auriculotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve (V), a small contribution from the facial nerve (VII), the tympanic branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve (IX, the nerve of Jacobson), the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (X, the nerve of Arnold), and the great auricular and lesser occipital nerves from the C2 and C3 spinal segments. Every one of those nerves also serves distant territory: the trigeminal serves the teeth and the temporomandibular joint, the glossopharyngeal the throat and tonsil, the vagus the larynx and hypopharynx, and the cervical nerves the neck. A disease anywhere in that far-flung territory can therefore announce itself as ear pain (Norris & Koontz, 2020).

Why the misattribution happens is a question about the nervous system's inference, not its wiring alone, and the standard account is convergence-projection. Primary afferents from the ear and from a distant structure that shares its nerve converge onto the same second-order neurons in the brainstem and spinal cord. A single second-order neuron cannot label which of its converging inputs fired; it forwards an undifferentiated signal, and the brain, interpreting it, assigns the pain to whichever source is statistically more usual or better represented in the cortical map. Because the ear surface is a frequent and well-mapped source of sensation, throat or dental nociception carried on a shared line is read as coming from the ear. Referred pain is, in this sense, a systematic and predictable error of source inference built into the economy of a nervous system that pools inputs.

That pooling is also the substrate of the single most influential idea in pain science. Gate control theory proposed that the transmission of nociceptive signals through the dorsal horn is regulated by a gate, opened by small nociceptive fibers, tended toward closure by large touch fibers, and biased in either direction by descending signals from the brain (Melzack & Wall, 1965). The same convergent architecture that lets throat pain masquerade as earache lets touch and descending control modulate it, and lets sustained input sensitize it: when nociceptive drive persists, the second-order neurons can grow more responsive, a process of central sensitization that amplifies subsequent signals and can keep pain going after its original cause is gone (Woolf, 2011; Graven-Nielsen & Arendt-Nielsen, 2010). An ear that has hurt for a long time can thus become a poor guide not only to where the pain began but to whether anything is still wrong at all.

Convergence-projection: one line, two possible sources

Ear and throat afferents converge on the same second-order neuron. The brain cannot tell which one fired, so it defaults to the more common source over a lifetime, the ear. Fire the throat and watch the brain still report an earache.

earthroatshared neuronbrain readsEAR
Actual source: the throat · Felt location: the ear
Misattributed: the throat is firing, but it feels like an earache.

The brain infers the source from which line is active, having learned that this line usually means the ear (prior probability about 82%). When a shared line carries a rarer signal from the throat, that learned bet becomes a systematic error.

Measuring Ear Pain

Because pain is private, it cannot be read off an instrument the way an eardrum can be inspected; it must be measured through report, and earache makes the difficulty acute because its typical sufferer is a young child who cannot yet give one. The measurement of pain in children is a field in its own right, and it divides by what the child can do. A child old enough to understand a graded scale can give a self-report, the gold standard, and the most widely used tool is the Faces Pain Scale-Revised: a row of six faces ranging from neutral to maximum distress, scored 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10, from which the child chooses the one that matches how much they hurt (Hicks et al., 2001). Its faces were deliberately drawn without tears or smiles so that the scale measures pain intensity rather than mood, and its common zero-to-ten metric lets a child's rating be compared with an adult's.

For the infant or toddler in whom otitis media is commonest, even that is impossible, and pain must be inferred from behavior. Observational scales code cues such as crying, facial expression, body posture, and consolability into a score, a method whose validity and limits have been mapped systematically: behavioral measures capture distress well but cannot cleanly separate pain from fear or hunger, and they systematically diverge from self-report where both can be obtained (von Baeyer & Spagrud, 2007). For older children and adults, the multidimensional structure of pain can be recovered with instruments such as the McGill Pain Questionnaire, which scores sensory, affective, and evaluative descriptors rather than a single intensity, distinguishing the sharp, stabbing quality of an acute otitis from the dull, aching pain referred from the neck (Melzack, 1975). Across all of these tools runs one theme: measuring earache is a psychophysical act of scaling a private experience, not a physical reading of the ear, and its accuracy turns on matching the instrument to what the person can report (Treede et al., 2019).

Faces Pain Scale-Revised: reading a pain no one else can feel

A young child cannot rate pain on a number line, but can point to a face. The six faces map to an even 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 scale. Choose the face a child might point to and read off the score the clinician records.

0246810
Select a face to record a score.

The scale converts a private experience into a public number, but the number is an inference from a chosen face, not a direct reading of the pain. Its even spacing lets scores be averaged and compared across children and across time.

Attention, Meaning, and the Experience of Earache

The intensity of an earache is set not only by the nociceptive signal but by what the brain does with it, and the first modulator is attention. Pain is built to interrupt: it captures attention, disrupts whatever a person was doing, and demands a response, an interruptive function that is itself a cognitive-affective mechanism and helps explain why a child's earache seems to worsen at night, when darkness and quiet have stripped away every competing demand on attention (Eccleston & Crombez, 1999). The same mechanism runs the other way: distraction genuinely reduces pain, and the anxious over-monitoring of an aching ear genuinely increases it, both operating through the descending control that gate control theory anticipated and that is now mapped to specific cognitive and emotional brain systems (Bushnell et al., 2013).

The second modulator is meaning. The same nociceptive signal is a minor nuisance when it is read as an ordinary earache and a source of dread when it is read as a sign of serious disease, and this is not merely a matter of mood: the interpretation feeds back through descending pathways onto the transmission of the signal itself (Melzack & Wall, 1965). For most earache the meaning is benign and the pain is self-limiting, but referred otalgia carries a distinctive clinical weight precisely because of what it can mean, since persistent unexplained ear pain in an adult with a normal ear is a recognized warning sign that must prompt a search of the throat and larynx for a hidden cause (Norris & Koontz, 2020). Managing pain well therefore means managing more than nociception; it means addressing attention, interpretation, and, where pain has become chronic and amplified, the central mechanisms that keep it going (Cohen et al., 2021).

Worked Example

Suppose a 5-year-old is brought in with a painful right ear, and the examining clinician finds the ear itself entirely normal: clear canal, healthy eardrum, no sign of infection. The task is to locate the source, and the ear's convergent innervation makes the reasoning concrete. First, self-report: the child is old enough for the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and points to the fourth face, a score of 6 out of 10, moderate-to-severe pain that is real and needs explaining despite the normal ear. Because the ear is normal, the pain is almost certainly referred, and the candidate sources are exactly the structures that share the ear's five nerves. Working through them, the clinician checks the teeth and jaw joint, served with the ear by the trigeminal nerve; the throat and tonsil, served by the glossopharyngeal; the larynx, served by the vagus; and the neck, served by the upper cervical nerves. On examining the mouth, an erupting, inflamed molar on the right side is found. The dental nociception travels on the auriculotemporal nerve, converges in the brainstem with afferents from the ear, and is projected by the brain to the ear, the more usual and better-mapped source. The point of the exercise is what fixed the pain: not a drop in the ear, but treatment of a tooth. The felt location was the ear; the actual source was two structures away, linked only by a shared nerve, and only an account of pain as inferred rather than transmitted makes that outcome intelligible.

Discussion

Earache is one of the commonest complaints in all of medicine, and it turns out to require the whole apparatus of pain science to explain. Its simplest form, the otitis media of a feverish child, is a genuine local disease, and it is tempting to generalize from that case and treat all ear pain as a readout of a problem in the ear. But the sheer frequency of referred otalgia, the convergence-projection mechanism that produces it, the power of attention and meaning to amplify or dampen it, and the capacity of a sensitized system to sustain it after its cause is gone all show that felt ear pain is constructed by the nervous system rather than transmitted intact from the ear. This is the general lesson of pain research made unusually concrete by anatomy: the experience of pain is the joint product of nociception, convergence and gating in the central nervous system, and cognitive interpretation, and the felt location is an inference that can be wrong.

The practical corollary is that earache sits at the boundary of several specialties and is managed badly when the ear is treated in isolation. Repeatedly treating a normal ear leaves a dental or pharyngeal source untouched, and dismissing persistent referred otalgia as trivial can miss a serious cause in the throat. Earache is also a clear demonstration of why the measurement of pain is a psychophysical rather than a physical act, and why building instruments that fit what a preverbal child can report is not a convenience but the only access anyone has to the experience being treated.

Current Directions

Two lines of current work bear directly on earache. The first is the maturing science of pediatric pain measurement, the field earache does so much to motivate. Self-report tools such as the Faces Pain Scale-Revised are now the subject of active work on how young children actually use them, on the systematic biases of the observational scales used for infants, and on how to combine the two as a child develops, all aimed at the recurring finding that behavioral and self-report measures do not simply agree (von Baeyer & Spagrud, 2007). The second is the broader reframing of chronic pain that has reshaped how persistent otalgia is understood. The recognition of a third mechanistic category of pain, nociplastic pain, arising from altered central processing rather than from ongoing tissue damage or a nerve lesion, gives a name to the ear pain that outlasts its cause and responds poorly to treatments aimed at the ear (Woolf, 2011). Alongside it, the formal separation of acute pain as a symptom from chronic pain as a condition in its own right, now embedded in the international disease classification, has changed how long-standing ear pain is coded, studied, and managed (Treede et al., 2019). Together these developments are pushing the care of difficult earache away from a narrow focus on the ear and toward the source-finding, measurement, and central-mechanism perspective this article describes (Cohen et al., 2021).

Common Misconceptions

Ear pain always means an ear problem.
A large share of earache, especially in adults, is referred from the teeth, jaw, throat, larynx, or neck through the ear's shared nerves, and the ear itself is normal. A normal ear examination does not mean the pain is imaginary; it means the source is elsewhere (Norris & Koontz, 2020).
If a child cannot describe the pain, it cannot be measured.
Pain in preverbal children is measured with validated observational scales that code crying, facial expression, posture, and consolability, and older children self-report with faces scales; the measurement is real, though it must be matched to what the child can do (Hicks et al., 2001; von Baeyer & Spagrud, 2007).
Referred pain is felt in the wrong place by mistake, so it is not real.
Referred pain is a systematic consequence of how afferents converge on shared neurons, not a random error, and the pain is as real as any other. The brain's assignment of the pain to the ear is a principled inference from pooled signals, not a fault (Melzack & Wall, 1965).

Glossary

Arnold's nerve.
The auricular branch of the vagus nerve (CN X), which supplies part of the ear canal and links laryngeal and pharyngeal disease to referred ear pain.
Auriculotemporal nerve.
A branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve (CN V) that supplies the outer ear and links dental and jaw-joint disease to referred ear pain.
Central sensitization.
An increase in the responsiveness of central pain neurons following sustained input, amplifying subsequent pain and able to keep pain going after its original cause resolves.
Convergence-projection.
The account of referred pain in which afferents from two structures converge on one second-order neuron, so the brain cannot recover the true source and projects the pain to the more usual one.
Faces Pain Scale-Revised.
A self-report tool for children in which six drawn faces from neutral to maximum distress are scored 0 to 10, chosen to measure pain intensity rather than mood.
Gate control theory.
The theory that a gating mechanism in the dorsal horn regulates nociceptive transmission, modulated by large-fiber input and by descending control from the brain.
Jacobson's nerve.
The tympanic branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve (CN IX), which supplies the middle ear and links throat and tonsil disease to referred ear pain.
Nociception.
The neural encoding of stimuli that threaten tissue; the peripheral signaling that precedes, but is not identical to, pain.
Nociplastic pain.
Pain arising from altered nociceptive processing without clear evidence of tissue damage or a nerve lesion; the mechanism behind ear pain that outlasts its cause.
Observational pain scale.
A measure that infers pain in a preverbal or nonverbal person from coded behavior such as crying, facial expression, posture, and consolability.
Otalgia.
The medical term for ear pain; earache. Divided into primary (otogenic) otalgia from the ear itself and secondary (referred) otalgia from elsewhere.
Otitis media.
Infection or inflammation of the middle ear; the commonest cause of primary ear pain in young children.
Primary (otogenic) otalgia.
Ear pain arising from disease of the ear itself, such as otitis media or otitis externa.
Referred pain.
Pain felt at a site distant from its source; in the ear it is common because the ear shares its nerves with the teeth, jaw, throat, larynx, and neck.
Secondary (referred) otalgia.
Ear pain whose source lies outside a structurally normal ear, reaching awareness over the ear's shared cranial and cervical innervation.

Key Researchers

Carl L. von Baeyer (contemporary). Emeritus professor of psychology and pediatrics at the University of Saskatchewan, a leading figure in the measurement of pain in children and co-developer of the Faces Pain Scale-Revised. Wikipedia - Wikidata - Google Scholar

Christopher Eccleston (contemporary). Director of the Centre for Pain Research at the University of Bath, whose cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain explains how ear pain captures and holds attention. Faculty Page - ORCID - Google Scholar

Ronald Melzack (1929-2019). Psychologist at McGill University who, with Patrick Wall, proposed the gate control theory of pain and developed the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the foundational instrument for the multidimensional measurement of pain. Wikipedia - Wikidata - Google Scholar

Anne G. M. Schilder (contemporary). Professor of otolaryngology at University College London who led the definitive synthesis of otitis media, the commonest cause of primary ear pain in children. Faculty Page - ORCID - Google Scholar

Patrick David Wall (1925-2001). Neuroscientist at University College London who co-developed the gate control theory of pain with Melzack and founded the journal Pain. Wikipedia - Wikidata

Clifford J. Woolf (contemporary). Neurobiologist at Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School who described central sensitization and its implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Faculty Page - Wikipedia - Wikidata

Frequently Asked Questions

What is earache?
Earache, or otalgia, is pain felt in or around the ear. It is a symptom rather than a single disease, and it may arise from the ear itself or be referred from the teeth, jaw, throat, larynx, or neck (Norris & Koontz, 2020).

Does ear pain always mean something is wrong with the ear?
No. A large share of earache, especially in adults, is referred pain: the ear is normal and the true source is a tooth, the jaw joint, the throat, the larynx, or the neck, felt in the ear because those structures share its nerves (Norris & Koontz, 2020).

Why can a sore throat or a bad tooth make the ear hurt?
The ear shares sensory nerves with the throat (the glossopharyngeal nerve) and the teeth and jaw (the trigeminal nerve). Signals from those structures converge with signals from the ear on shared neurons, and the brain assigns the pain to the ear, the more usual source (Norris & Koontz, 2020).

Why is earache so common in young children?
The eustachian tube that drains the middle ear is short and horizontal in early childhood, so it clears poorly and middle-ear infection, otitis media, is nearly universal; it is one of the commonest reasons a child is seen by a doctor (Schilder et al., 2016).

How is ear pain measured in a child too young to describe it?
Through validated observational scales that infer pain from behavior, coding crying, facial expression, posture, and consolability into a score. Older children self-report with a faces scale such as the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (Hicks et al., 2001; von Baeyer & Spagrud, 2007).

Why does an earache feel worse at night?
Pain is built to capture attention, and at night the darkness and quiet remove the competing demands that distract from it during the day, so the same nociceptive signal is felt more intensely (Eccleston & Crombez, 1999).

Can ear pain be a sign of something serious?
Persistent, unexplained ear pain in an adult whose ear looks normal is a recognized warning sign, because it can be referred from a hidden problem in the throat or larynx that needs to be looked for (Norris & Koontz, 2020).

Why does ear pain sometimes continue after an infection has cleared?
Sustained nociceptive input can sensitize central pain neurons, so pain is amplified and can persist even after the original cause is gone, the mechanism now called nociplastic pain (Woolf, 2011).

References

Bushnell, M. C., Čeko, M., & Low, L. A. (2013). Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3516

Cohen, S. P., Vase, L., & Hooten, W. M. (2021). Chronic pain: An update on burden, best practices, and new advances. The Lancet, 397(10289), 2082-2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7

Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999). Pain demands attention: A cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356

Graven-Nielsen, T., & Arendt-Nielsen, L. (2010). Assessment of mechanisms in localized and widespread musculoskeletal pain. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 6(10), 599-606. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.107

Hicks, C. L., von Baeyer, C. L., Spafford, P. A., van Korlaar, I., & Goodenough, B. (2001). The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: Toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain, 93(2), 173-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1

Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science, 150(3699), 971-979. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3699.971

Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1(3), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5

Norris, C. D., & Koontz, N. A. (2020). Secondary otalgia: Referred pain pathways and pathologies. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 41(12), 2188-2198. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6808

Raja, S. N., Carr, D. B., Cohen, M., Finnerup, N. B., Flor, H., Gibson, S., Keefe, F. J., Mogil, J. S., Ringkamp, M., Sluka, K. A., Song, X.-J., Stevens, B., Sullivan, M. D., Tutelman, P. R., Ushida, T., & Vader, K. (2020). The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: Concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain, 161(9), 1976-1982. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939

Schilder, A. G. M., Chonmaitree, T., Cripps, A. W., Rosenfeld, R. M., Casselbrant, M. L., Haggard, M. P., & Venekamp, R. P. (2016). Otitis media. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2, 16063. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.63

Treede, R.-D., Rief, W., Barke, A., Aziz, Q., Bennett, M. I., Benoliel, R., Cohen, M., Evers, S., Finnerup, N. B., First, M. B., Giamberardino, M. A., Kaasa, S., Korwisi, B., Kosek, E., Lavand'homme, P., Nicholas, M., Perrot, S., Scholz, J., Schug, S., … Wang, S.-J. (2019). Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: The IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain, 160(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384

von Baeyer, C. L., & Spagrud, L. J. (2007). Systematic review of observational (behavioral) measures of pain for children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years. Pain, 127(1-2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.014

Woolf, C. J. (2011). Central sensitization: Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain. Pain, 152(3 Suppl), S2-S15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.030